End-of-day S&P 500 futures · two sizing modes

Systematic S&P 500 Compounding
Strategy for Small Accounts

AVALONPLUS is a rule-based end-of-day S&P 500 futures strategy and Android app for experienced traders who want to pursue substantially higher long-term returns than passive investing — through selective MES/ES signals, systematic position sizing and compounding reinvestment.

63 years backtested · 203 historical trades · 2–5 trades per year · Trading costs included

Start your free 30-day trial AVALONPLUS Android app screens: dashboard, risk visualizer, trade journal, backtester, charts and futures roll calendar
In the AVALONPLUS Android app (Google Play) · No credit card required for the trial · Then keep the Free plan or go Premium ($499/yr or $59/mo) · Subscriptions renew automatically · Cancel anytime in Google Play

The MES contract at $5 per index point is what makes this method tradable from $10,000 at full size — with position size and risk set by the same rules that generate the signals.

One system, two modes

Same rules. You choose how much of the account trades them.

It is one switch in the app, and it changes everything downstream — return, drawdown and the capital you need. You can change it any time.

Full size — grow a small account

Every position is sized on the whole account: the fastest compounding the rules allow, and the largest drawdowns. Possible from $10,000. This is the mode the figures on this page describe.

50/50 — an alternative to a buy-and-hold ETF

Half the account sizes each position, the other half stays in cash. Its worst decline was about a third of the one an S&P 500 ETF took — 15.0 % against 55.8 % — and it stayed ahead of that ETF in every window tested. Needs about $24,900. See the ETF comparison →

The AVALONPLUS dashboard with the sizing switch in the header set to 50/50
One switch, in the header of every screen — every figure in the app follows it.

Both modes explained in four minutes: watch the video on the ETF alternative page →

The idea in 3 minutes

Why small accounts get stuck — and what this strategy does about it

Nothing is sent to YouTube until you press play. Privacy policy · Watch on YouTube

Which mode is yours?

Full size or 50/50 — the decision in two minutes

Side by side, with the numbers: Full size vs 50/50 · Watch on YouTube

AVALONPLUS at a glance

What is the AVALONPLUS trading system?

AVALONPLUS is a subscription-based Android app and trading strategy published by Trading Garden in Austria. It provides daily end-of-day model position and approximately 2–5 rule-based trade signals per year for the S&P 500, executed manually through MES or ES futures at the trader's own broker. The app includes signal notifications, a 63-year backtester, interactive charts, risk analysis and a position-sizing calculator. It does not execute trades, connect to a broker or hold customer funds.

How the S&P 500 trading system works →

Product
Rule-based S&P 500 futures strategy and Android app
Provider
Trading Garden, Austria
Instruments
MES and ES futures
Minimum capital
$10,000 full size, $24,900 at 50/50
Model position
Updated daily after the close
Trade signals
Approximately 2–5 per year; manual entry at next session open
Backtest
1963–2026 · 63 years · 203 historical trades
Free plan & trial
30-day Premium trial · no credit card required. After it, stay on the Free plan (no live signals — closed trades only) or subscribe to Premium. Subscriptions renew automatically · cancel anytime in Google Play.
Premium price
$499 / year or $59 / month through Google Play (Free plan stays free)
Risk
Leveraged, high-risk; hypothetical backtest results

Last updated · backtest data through .

The problem

Limited capital usually means limited profit.

A broad S&P 500 index fund returned about 8.4 % a year over the last 26 years — dividends reinvested, costs deducted. That is a real return, and for long-term money most people should stop right there. On a small account it buys this:

$10,000 in the indexprofit
after 1 year$840
after 3 years$2,738
after 5 years$4,967
after 10 years$12,402

Nothing is wrong with the percentage. The problem is the base it works on. AVALONPLUS was built to give a small account access to substantially higher long-term growth potential, at substantially higher risk.

The approach

A small number of selective, rule-based moves.

MES & ES futures

Trades the S&P 500 via Micro / E-mini futures — built-in leverage so a small stake controls a meaningful position.

Long, Short or Flat

Participates in up-trends, can profit from down-moves, and stays out (flat/cash) when there is no edge (~⅓ of the time in market).

Few trades a year

About 2–5 signals per year — selectivity over activity. No day-trading, no screen-watching.

End-of-day model position

Model position is recalculated daily after the close; the ~2–5 actual trade signals per year are executed manually at the next session's open. Minutes a day.

Rule-based sizing

Position size is computed from a fixed risk budget per trade — mechanical, not discretionary.

Compounding

Profits are reinvested into larger positions — turning a positive per-trade edge into exponential, not linear, growth.

Historical potential · hypothetical simulation

What could systematic compounding have achieved?

Compounding is the whole point of the method: profits are reinvested into larger positions, so the same rules produce exponential rather than linear growth. That is also why the drawdowns are large — the return and the risk below come from the same mechanism.

Hypothetical backtest · MES futures · costs included · before tax
Starting capital
$10,000
Period
2000 – 2026 (27 years)
Trades
87 (about 3 per year)
Profits
reinvested (compounding)
Position size
Normalize Positions on — capped at 500 MES contracts
Backtester settings
Transaction Costs on · Interest on Cash on · Pos. Size 50/50 off · Annual Adjustments off · Normalize Positions on
Growth of $10,000
≈ $18.4M
CAGR
32.6 %
Max drawdown
−27.7 %
Buy & hold S&P 500 ETF, same $10,000
≈ $85,086 (8.4 % p.a.)
Calendar-year returns
2026*
+17.7 %
2025
+9.6 %
2024
+32.6 %
2023
+4.2 %
2022
-3.4 %
2021
+44.1 %
2020
+83.1 %
2019
+5.9 %
2018
+31.2 %
2017
+19.3 %

*2026 through 2026-09-03. Same basis as above: $10,000 start, full size, profits reinvested, MES futures, costs included, before tax. At 50/50 sizing every figure in this block is lower — see the ETF comparison.

HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE. These results were not achieved with real money. Simulated results do not represent actual trading and may under- or over-compensate for the impact of factors such as lack of liquidity. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.

Leverage is roughly 5–10×; the return above and the drawdown above come from the same leverage. Figures assume a $10,000 account — results are not proportional to account size, because position size moves in whole MES contracts and Normalize Positions (the app's default) caps it at 500. Before tax; at the 26 % rate used in the app the CAGR is lower. Exported from the AVALONPLUS app backtester (data through 2026-09-03); over the full history since 1963 the same rules produced ≈ $37.3M (13.8 % p.a.). Every timeframe, $10K and $100K, reinvest and no-reinvest, with Sharpe / Sortino / Calmar is in the Strategy Report.

Why it could work

The logic behind the trading system's edge.

  • Participation in strong market phases (trend-following longs).
  • The ability to trade short signals, not just go long.
  • Avoiding permanent capital lock-up — in cash when there is no signal.
  • Concentration on a few selective setups instead of many marginal trades.
  • Reinvestment of successful results, so winners fund larger future positions.
Before you decide

What this trading system does — and what it asks of you.

Both columns matter. If the right one is a problem for you, the left one will not make up for it.

What it does well

  • Mechanical. Fixed rules, no discretion, no screen-watching. The model position is recalculated once a day after the close.
  • Selective. About 2–5 trades a year, roughly a third of the time in the market. The rest is cash.
  • Built for small accounts. MES futures at $5 per index point make the strategy tradable from $10,000 at full size.
  • Sizing is part of the rules. Position size comes from a fixed stop distance, not from a gut feeling — and it compounds as capital grows. Run the numbers in the futures position size calculator.
  • Fully disclosed. Methodology, parameters and the complete backtest from 1963 are public, and the app lets you re-run every figure yourself.

What it asks of you

  • High risk, by design. Leverage of roughly 5–10×. This is not a low-risk ETF alternative.
  • One bad stop is expensive. With the default settings a triggered stop costs about 31–61% of the account, depending on how your capital divides into whole contracts — and a wider stop costs more, not less. The Risk Visualizer in the app shows the figure for your own capital and settings. In 63 years of backtest this stop was never reached: it is the backstop, not the exit.
  • Deep drawdowns are normal. −27.7% occurred in the backtest. In 1,000 reshuffles of the same trades the median was −21% and the worst 5% reached −35% — the historical order was worse than the median, not better. Reshuffling shows how much depended on sequence; it does not model a future in which the edge weakens.
  • A thin sample. 87 trades in 27 years, about 3.3 a year. Every statistic on this page rests on that — a win rate from so few trades carries a wide margin of error.
  • The subscription costs real money on a small account. $499 a year is about 5% of a $10,000 account; the monthly plan works out higher. At 3.3 signals a year, judge it against what you expect to trade — not against the backtest.
  • You place the orders. The app gives signals, not execution. You need a futures account and you have to act promptly at the next open.
  • Patience. Long flat periods are part of the method, not a fault. Few signals means little to do — for months at a time.
Holding an S&P 500 ETF?

More return than buy-and-hold — at about a third of the drawdown.

With 50/50 sizing — half the account sizes each position, half stays in cash — AVALONPLUS beat a buy-and-hold S&P 500 ETF in every window tested, while holding a position only about a third of the time.

Since 2000, growth per year
27.1 % vs 8.4 % for the ETF
Worst decline
15.0 % vs 55.8 % for the ETF
In the four crises since 1987
the ETF lost every time; the strategy gained — three times without any decline at all
What it takes
$24,900, a futures account, and one order every few months

Hypothetical backtest, $24,900 starting capital, Transaction Costs on · Interest on Cash on · Pos. Size 50/50 on · Annual Adjustments off · Normalize Positions on, costs and interest on cash included. The full comparison, window by window.

Compared to other "trading systems"

The difference is not a secret formula. It is disclosure.

Signal services are easy to find and hard to compare, because most publish the same short list of favourable numbers. Here is what is common practice — and what you get instead.

Point Common practice AVALONPLUS
Test period Three years of track record counts as enough; backtests typically run up to ten years — one market regime. 63 years, 1963 to today: 1973/74, 1987, dot-com, 2008, 2020.
Method Not disclosing the rules is one of the standard red flags of this market. Rules and parameters are public, and every figure can be recomputed in the app on your own settings.
Overfitting Optimised parameters are sold as a strength; the limits of the fit are among the most frequently omitted disclosures. The optimisation method was tested against unseen years and rejected: brilliant in-sample, −116,683 out-of-sample. None of those filters is in the product.
Sequence risk Rarely shown, although the same trades in a different order can turn a 15% drawdown into 25% or worse. Quantified with 10,000 simulations — median, 95th and 99th percentile — and built into the app, not just the brochure.
Cost of being wrong Win rates get advertised; what one losing trade costs is left to you. Stated plainly: a triggered stop removes about 61% of the account.

One thing a long backtest cannot replace: an independently verified live track record. AVALONPLUS does not have one yet — the predecessor strategy has been traded live since March 2020, but that record is self-reported. The full comparison, including where AVALONPLUS is not ahead, is in the strategy report.

The risk — read this

Higher return potential requires higher risk tolerance.

Unlike 50/50 sizing, full size is not an alternative to an ETF. It is a high-risk strategy for traders seeking substantially higher return potential — designed for people who understand futures, accept significant drawdowns and are prepared to follow a long-term process. Everything in this section describes full size. The ETF alternative is 50/50 sizing — same rules, half the position, about a third of the drawdown.

What that means concretely: average leverage ~5–10×, and the strategy holds one position at a time, sized from the full capital — so a single triggered stop is expensive. The figures, the stress tests behind them and what they cost in each sizing mode are in the risk section of the Strategy Report →

All figures are hypothetical backtests; past performance, real or simulated, does not guarantee future results. The predecessor strategy AVALON has been traded live since March 2020; AVALONPLUS itself — the further-developed Android successor — only recently went live, so its own live sample is still small.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the AVALONPLUS S&P 500 trading system?

A rule-based S&P 500 futures strategy and Android app that provides end-of-day model position, approximately 2–5 trade signals per year, backtesting and risk tools. It does not execute trades.

Does AVALONPLUS execute trades?

No. It provides analysis and signals only. Traders place orders manually through their own broker.

Which instruments can be used?

The signals are designed for the S&P 500 and are implemented with MES or ES futures. AVALONPLUS recommends futures only. A CFD tracking the index opens at 09:30 New York, so its weekend gap reached −7.5% historically against −3.0% for the future — and it charges daily financing, which a future does not. MES suits accounts of roughly $10k–$100k; above that, ES. Test the difference in the built-in backtester.

What is 50/50 sizing?

50/50 sizes each position on half the account; the other half stays in cash and takes half of every gain. The stop distance is unchanged, so it does not make a stop less likely — it halves what one costs. It costs return: 50/50 roughly halves the compound growth rate - over three years that is about a third of the profit, and over ten years and more the gap widens sharply, because two compounding curves drift apart exponentially. And it needs $24,900 — one contract becomes possible at $14,000, but only from $24,900 did the account survive the worst stretch in the test data — the August 2011 downgrade, which took a full-size account down 68 %. Below that, use full size. This is advice, not a rule: switch when a drawdown hurts in dollars, not when it hurts in percent. Percent feels the same at $10,000 and at $100,000 — dollars do not.

How much starting capital is required?

One MES contract ties up $7,000 at the current index level (7,754) — stop distance plus margin — but the floor is $10,000 with floor with full position sizing. 50/50 sizing needs $24,900: one contract becomes possible at $14,000, but only from $24,900 did the account survive the worst stretch in the test data — the August 2011 downgrade, which took a full-size account down 68 %. Below that, use full size. The published small-account examples use $10,000. Actual broker margin and personal risk limits can require more.

How often does AVALONPLUS trade?

The app updates model position daily after the close, but new entry or exit signals occur only approximately 2–5 times per year.

What does AVALONPLUS cost?

The first 30 days are a free Premium trial. Afterwards you can stay on the Free plan at no cost (no live signals — closed trades only) or subscribe to Premium for live signals and trades — currently $499 per year or $59 per month through Google Play.

Are the published results live or backtested?

The large performance figures are hypothetical backtests. AVALONPLUS began live trading in 2026 and its own live sample is still small. The predecessor AVALON, which uses the same principle, has been traded live since March 2020; AVALONPLUS is its refinement with insights from recent years.

Is AVALONPLUS safer than an ETF?

Not at full size: that mode sizes every position on the whole account and carries substantially higher loss risk than an ETF. With 50/50 sizing the answer is different — in every window tested it produced more return than a buy-and-hold S&P 500 ETF at about a third of the drawdown, because it holds a position only about a third of the time. It is still leveraged futures, still hypothetical backtest results, and you still place the orders yourself.

Try it free

You don't have to decide on the next ten years today.

Install the AVALONPLUS Android app and start with 30 free days — see how signals are communicated, how position sizes are calculated, and how transparently the trading strategy is documented.

Get the Android app — start your free 30 days AVALONPLUS Android app: dashboard, risk visualizer, trade journal, backtester, charts and futures roll calendar
30-day free trial in the AVALONPLUS Android app (Google Play) · No credit card required for the trial · Then keep the Free plan or go Premium ($499/yr or $59/mo) · Subscriptions renew automatically · Cancel anytime in Google Play

After the trial: keep the Free plan at no cost (no live signals — closed trades only) — or go Premium for live signals and trades at $499 / year (≈ $41.58 / month, billed annually) or $59 / month, billed through Google Play. A complete, rule-based S&P 500 futures strategy designed to turn limited trading capital into meaningful long-term growth.