Systematic Compounding
S&P 500 Trading Strategy
for Small Accounts
AVALONPLUS provides a daily end-of-day model position and about two to five trade signals per year for experienced MES and ES traders. The Android app adds position sizing, risk analysis, charts and a backtester going back to 1963. It does not connect to a broker or place orders.
63 years backtested · 203 historical trades · 2–5 trades per year · Commissions and modeled slippage included
Start your free 30-day trial
What is the AVALONPLUS trading system?
Nothing is sent to YouTube until you press play. Privacy policy · Watch on YouTube
AVALONPLUS is a subscription-based Android app and trading strategy published by Trading Garden in Austria. It gives the daily end-of-day model position and about 2–5 rule-based signals a year for the S&P 500. You place the orders yourself in MES or ES futures at your own broker. The app includes signal notifications, a 63-year backtester, interactive charts, risk analysis and a position-sizing calculator. It does not execute trades, connect to a broker or hold customer funds.
How the S&P 500 trading system works →
- Product
- Rule-based S&P 500 futures strategy and Android app
- Provider
- Trading Garden, Austria
- Instruments
- MES and ES futures
- Minimum capital
- $10,000 full size, $25,000 at 50/50
- Model position
- Updated daily after the close
- Trade signals
- Approximately 2–5 per year; manual entry at next session open
- Backtest
- 1963–2026 · 63 years · 203 historical trades
- Plans
- 30-day Premium trial, no credit card required — then Free or Premium. See the table below.
- Risk
- Leveraged, high-risk; hypothetical backtest results
What the Free plan includes
| Free | Premium | |
|---|---|---|
| Today’s model position and live signal | — | yes |
| Open trade, with entry and stop | — | yes |
| Push notification on a new signal | — | yes |
| Futures roll push notification | — | yes |
| Closed trades, full history | yes | yes |
| Backtester, 63 years | yes | yes |
| Charts, risk visualizer, trade journal | yes | yes |
| Futures and VIX quotes, news, calendar | yes | yes |
| Price | free, no time limit | $499 per year or $59 per month |
Billed through Google Play, renews automatically, cancel anytime. You also need your own broker account with futures access — AVALONPLUS sends signals, it does not place orders.
Last updated · backtest data through .
Limited capital usually means limited profit.
A broad S&P 500 index fund returned about 8.3 % a year over the last 26 years — dividends reinvested, costs deducted. On a small account it buys this:
Nothing is wrong with the percentage. The problem is the base it works on. AVALONPLUS was built to give a small account access to substantially higher long-term growth potential, at substantially higher risk.
A small number of selective, rule-based moves.
MES & ES futures
Trades the S&P 500 via Micro / E-mini futures — built-in leverage so a small stake controls a meaningful position.
Long, Short or Flat
Participates in uptrends, can profit from down moves, and stays out (flat/cash) when there is no edge (about one-third of the time in the market).
Few trades a year
About 2–5 signals per year — selectivity over activity. No day-trading, no screen-watching.
End-of-day model position
Model position is recalculated daily after the close; the ~2–5 actual trade signals per year are executed manually at the next session's open. Minutes a day.
Rule-based sizing
Position size is computed from a fixed risk budget per trade — mechanical, not discretionary.
Compounding
Profits are reinvested into larger positions — turning a positive per-trade edge into exponential, not linear, growth.
What could systematic compounding have achieved?
Compounding is the whole point of the method: profits are reinvested into larger positions, so the same rules produce exponential rather than linear growth. That is also why the drawdowns are large — the return and the risk below come from the same mechanism.
- Starting capital
- $10,000
- Period
- 2000 – 2026 (26 years)
- Trades
- 87 (about 3 per year)
- Profits
- reinvested (compounding)
- Position size
- Normalize Positions on — capped at 500 MES contracts
- Backtester settings
- Transaction Costs on · Interest on Cash on · Pos. Size 50/50 off · Annual Adjustments off · Normalize Positions on · prices through 2026-09-18
- Growth of $10,000
- ≈ $18.2M
- CAGR
- 32.5 %
- Max drawdown
- −27.7 %
- Buy & hold S&P 500 ETF, same $10,000
- ≈ $84,672 (8.3 % p.a.)
- Calendar-year returns
- 2026*
- +16.6 %
- 2025
- +9.6 %
- 2024
- +32.6 %
- 2023
- +4.2 %
- 2022
- -3.4 %
- 2021
- +44.1 %
- 2020
- +83.1 %
- 2019
- +5.9 %
- 2018
- +31.2 %
- 2017
- +19.3 %
*2026 through 2026-09-18. Same basis as above: $10,000 start, full size, profits reinvested, MES futures, costs included, before tax. At 50/50 sizing every figure in this block is lower — see the ETF comparison.
This is a backtest, not a track record. AVALONPLUS has no independently verified live record. The predecessor strategy has been traded live since March 2020, and that record is self-reported; AVALONPLUS itself went live recently, so its own live sample is still small.
HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE. These results were not achieved with real money. Simulated results do not represent actual trading and may under- or over-compensate for the impact of factors such as lack of liquidity. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
Leverage per trade is 1–9×; the return above and the drawdown above come from the same leverage. Figures assume a $10,000 account — results are not proportional to account size, because position size moves in whole MES contracts and Normalize Positions (the app's default) caps it at 500. Before tax; at the 26 % rate used in the app the CAGR is lower. Exported from the AVALONPLUS app backtester (data through 2026-09-18); over the full history since 1963 the same rules produced ≈ $37.1M (13.8 % p.a.). Every timeframe, $10K and $100K, reinvest and no-reinvest, with Sharpe / Sortino / Calmar is in the Strategy Report.
The logic behind the trading system's edge.
- Participation in strong market phases (trend-following longs).
- The ability to trade short signals, not just go long.
- Avoiding permanent capital lock-up — in cash when there is no signal.
- Concentration on a few selective setups instead of many marginal trades.
- Reinvestment of successful results, so winners fund larger future positions.
What this trading system does — and what it asks of you.
Both columns matter. If the right one is a problem for you, the left one will not make up for it.
What it does well
- Mechanical. Fixed rules, no discretion, no screen-watching. The model position is recalculated once a day after the close.
- Selective. About 2–5 trades a year, roughly a third of the time in the market. The rest is cash.
- Built for small accounts. MES futures at $5 per index point make the strategy tradable from $10,000 at full size.
- Sizing is part of the rules. Position size comes from a fixed stop distance, not from a gut feeling — and it compounds as capital grows. Run the numbers in the futures position size calculator.
- Documented in detail. The methodology, assumptions, position-sizing rules and the summary backtest from 1963 are public, and the app lets you re-run every figure yourself.
Requirements and risks
- High risk, by design. Leverage of 1–9× per trade. This is not a low-risk ETF alternative.
- One bad stop is expensive. With the default settings a triggered stop costs about 31–61% of the account, depending on how your capital divides into whole contracts — and a wider stop costs more, not less. The Risk Visualizer in the app shows the figure for your own capital and settings. In 63 years of backtest this stop was never reached: it is the backstop, not the exit.
- Deep drawdowns are normal. −27.7% occurred in the backtest. In 1,000 reshuffles of the same trades the median was −21% and the worst 5% reached −37% — the historical order was worse than the median, not better. Reshuffling shows how much depended on sequence; it does not model a future in which the edge weakens.
- A thin sample. 87 trades in 26 years, about 3.3 a year. Every statistic on this page rests on that — a win rate from so few trades carries a wide margin of error.
- The subscription costs real money on a small account. $499 a year is about 5% of a $10,000 account; the monthly plan works out higher. At 3.3 signals a year, judge it against what you expect to trade — not against the backtest.
- You place the orders. The app gives signals, not execution. You need a futures account and you have to act promptly at the next open.
- Patience. Long flat periods are part of the method, not a fault. Few signals means little to do — for months at a time.
More return than buy-and-hold — at about a third of the drawdown.
With 50/50 sizing — half the account sizes each position, half stays in cash — AVALONPLUS beat a buy-and-hold S&P 500 ETF in every window tested, while holding a position only about a third of the time.
- Since 2000, growth per year
- 27.2 % vs 8.3 % for the ETF
- Worst decline
- 14.9 % vs 55.8 % for the ETF
- In the four crises since 1987
- the ETF lost every time; the strategy gained — three times without any decline at all
- What it takes
- $25,000, a futures account, and one order every few months
Hypothetical backtest, $25,000 starting capital, Transaction Costs on · Interest on Cash on · Pos. Size 50/50 on · Annual Adjustments off · Normalize Positions on · prices through 2026-09-18, costs and interest on cash included. The full comparison, window by window.
The signals, costs and results are published and reproducible
Signal services are easy to find and hard to compare, because most publish the same short list of favorable numbers. Here is what is common practice — and what you get instead.
| Point | Common practice | AVALONPLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Test period | Three years of track record counts as enough; backtests typically run up to ten years — one market regime. | 63 years, 1963 to today: 1973/74, 1987, dot-com, 2008, 2020. |
| Method | Not disclosing the rules is one of the standard red flags of this market. | Rules and parameters are public, and every figure can be recomputed in the app on your own settings. |
| Overfitting | Optimized parameters are sold as a strength; the limits of the fit are among the most frequently omitted disclosures. | The optimization method was tested against unseen years and rejected: brilliant in-sample, −116,683 out-of-sample. None of those filters is in the product. |
| Sequence risk | Rarely shown, although the same trades in a different order can turn a 15% drawdown into 25% or worse. | Quantified with 10,000 simulations — median, 95th and 99th percentile — and built into the app, not just the brochure. |
| Cost of being wrong | Win rates get advertised; what one losing trade costs is left to you. | Stated plainly: a triggered stop removes about 61% of the account. |
One thing a long backtest cannot replace: an independently verified live track record. AVALONPLUS does not have one yet — the predecessor strategy has been traded live since March 2020, but that record is self-reported. The full comparison, including where AVALONPLUS is not ahead, is in the strategy report.
Higher return potential requires higher risk tolerance.
Unlike 50/50 sizing, full size is not an alternative to an ETF. It is a high-risk strategy that aims for a much higher return, with deep drawdowns along the way. Everything in this section describes full size. The ETF alternative is 50/50 sizing — same rules, half the position, about a third of the drawdown.
What that means concretely: leverage of 1–9× per trade. The strategy holds one position at a time, sized from the full capital, so a single triggered stop is expensive. The figures, the stress tests behind them and what they cost in each sizing mode are in the risk section of the Strategy Report →
All figures are hypothetical backtests; past performance, real or simulated, does not guarantee future results.
Frequently asked questions
What is the AVALONPLUS S&P 500 trading system?
A rule-based S&P 500 futures strategy and Android app that provides end-of-day model position, approximately 2–5 trade signals per year, backtesting and risk tools. It does not execute trades.
Does AVALONPLUS execute trades?
No. It provides analysis and signals only. Traders place orders manually through their own broker.
Which instruments can be used?
The signals are designed for the S&P 500 and are implemented with MES or ES futures. AVALONPLUS recommends futures only. Index CFDs are quoted by individual providers, and their trading hours and financing terms vary. A CFD does not trade through the futures session, so it has to absorb a larger opening gap: historically up to −7.5% against −3.0% for the future. CFDs also charge an explicit daily financing fee; with futures the cost of carry is built into the price instead. MES suits accounts of roughly $10k–$100k; above that, ES. Test the difference in the built-in backtester.
What is 50/50 sizing?
50/50 sizes each position on half the account; the other half stays in cash and takes half of every gain. The stop distance is unchanged, so it does not make a stop less likely — it halves what one costs. It reduces returns: 50/50 roughly halves the compound growth rate. Over three years that is about a third of the profit. Over ten years and more the gap grows much wider. And it needs $25,000. One contract becomes possible at $13,900. Only from $25,000 did the account survive the worst stretch in the test data, the August 2011 downgrade, which took a full-size account down 68 %. Below that, only full size is possible — and it carries materially greater risk. This is advice, not a rule: switch when a drawdown hurts in dollars, not when it hurts in percent.
How much starting capital is required?
One MES contract ties up $7,000 at the current index level (7,681) — stop distance plus margin — but the floor with full position sizing is $10,000. 50/50 sizing needs $25,000. One contract becomes possible at $13,900. Only from $25,000 did the account survive the worst stretch in the test data, the August 2011 downgrade, which took a full-size account down 68 %. Below that, only full size is possible — and it carries materially greater risk. The published small-account examples use $10,000. Actual broker margin and personal risk limits can require more.
How often does AVALONPLUS trade?
The app updates model position daily after the close, but new entry or exit signals occur only approximately 2–5 times per year.
What does AVALONPLUS cost?
The first 30 days are a free Premium trial. Afterwards you keep the Free plan at no cost. It shows closed trades only, no live signals. Premium adds live signals: $499 per year or $59 per month, billed through Google Play.
Are the published results live or backtested?
The large performance figures are hypothetical backtests. AVALONPLUS began live trading in 2026 and its own live sample is still small. The predecessor AVALON, which uses the same principle, has been traded live since March 2020; AVALONPLUS is its refinement with insights from recent years.
Is AVALONPLUS safer than an ETF?
Not at full size: that mode sizes every position on the whole account and carries substantially higher loss risk than an ETF. With 50/50 sizing the answer is different: in every window tested it produced more return than a buy-and-hold S&P 500 ETF, at about a third of the drawdown. It holds a position only about a third of the time. It is still leveraged futures, still hypothetical backtest results, and you still place the orders yourself.
You don't have to decide on the next ten years today.
Install the AVALONPLUS Android app and start with 30 free days. You see how signals arrive, how position sizes are calculated and how the strategy is documented.
Start your free 30-day trial
After the trial you keep the Free plan at no cost. It shows closed trades only, no live signals. Premium adds live signals: $499 per year (≈ $41.58 per month, billed annually) or $59 per month, billed through Google Play. A complete, rule-based S&P 500 futures strategy designed to turn limited trading capital into meaningful long-term growth.